Federal Register

If you are selected to be a reviewer, you will be required to immediately obtain a Data Universal Number System number and register in System for Award Management . Participating as a Peer Reviewer for external funding agencies is an excellent way to gain experience to grow and sustain your funded research profile. You will make contacts in your field and learn to identify what to do and what not to do on a grant application. Those not selected will remain in the EIR reviewer pool for future competitions.

ED solicits reviewers without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, age, or disability. ED will provide reasonable accommodations for an individual with a disability, so that the individual is able to participate in the review process. IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN SERVING AS A PANELIST, please go to the panelist registration page to get started. From there, you will receive instructions on a three-step process that must be completed by all candidates to be considered for future panel review assignments.

You can learn more about the grant by reading the Request for Application , which can also be found on the OREI page. HRSA wishes to identify more qualified reviewers who have expertise in social, cultural or health care issues of rural, migrant or Native American populations. Register in the RRM if you are interested in lending your expertise in any of these fields to our application review process. SAMHSA chooses peer reviewers based on their knowledge, skills, and expertise. If you are selected as an individual reviewer you are responsible to provide constructive and helpful comments, actively participate during consensus discussions, and meet deadlines established by AMS and panel chair. If you are selected as a panel chair you are responsible to serve as an individual reviewer and coordinate and lead the consensus review of applications and compile the consensus results through the peer review system. BFRDP applications are evaluated by a peer review panel of farmers, extension professionals, and beginning farmer educators.

We Welcome Potential Panelists With These Particular Areas Of Expertise

To ensure an ongoing talent pool, ETA recruits knowledgeable individuals to serve as grant application review panelists on a continuous basis. ETA is seeking a diverse pool of expertise from the workforce system, institutions of higher education, community and faith-based organizations, labor, business and industry partners, and other related organizations to review and score these applications along with Federal staff. The resumes will be kept on file for future ETA competitions, unless otherwise directed by applicants. We anticipate the wide ranging expertise of selected panelists will assist us in continuing to award grants of the highest quality.

federal grant reviewer

Selected panelists must make a commitment to be available for the preparation work leading up to the paneling, which could last as long as two weeks. The estimated workload for selected panelists in reviewing and evaluating grants is between 10 and 15 applications. Reviewers and Panel Coordinators are selected for competitions based on education and experience specific to a review. Once you have completed an application in eGrants, and your background is appropriate for a competition, a CNCS representative contacts you by e-mail to check on your availability to participate in that review. We often have more peer review applicants than we may need for a year, but we will maintain your application in our database for future reviews.


The BJA looks for peer reviewers with expertise in a broad range of criminal justice backgrounds including but not limited to crime prevention, adjudication, law enforcement and gangs, tribal justice, corrections, research and statistics, information, technology and social services. Participants will review remotely but are required to participate in an orientation call before beginning their reviews. Reviewers will score applications within 2 weeks, and are paid $125 per application. To become a reviewer, you can submit a current resume including an e-mail address to Chris Casto at , and for more information you can visit their website by clicking here.

Who can be a reviewer?

There are no specific qualifications needed to be a reviewer, but most reviewers will have a PhD. You certainly need to be able to prove you know the field of study well enough to be able to assess the novelty, quality, impact and importance of the research.

The OJP seeks qualified professionals to evaluate grant applications based on the specialist’s expertise, demographics and prior experience as a reviewer. A reviewer generally has 2-4 weeks to review applications and is asked to participate in a webinar, call, or in-person peer review that lasts 1-2 days. To start the process or for more information, email the OJP , and visit their website. Outreach and Assistance for Socially Disadvantaged and Veteran Farmers and Ranchers .

Be A Grant Reviewer For Usda Competitive Grants

The U.S. Department of Education announces opportunities for individuals to participate in its peer review process by reviewing applications for competitive grant funding. All proposals submitted for IMLS competitive awards are reviewed by library and museum professionals who know the needs of communities, can share promising practices, and are well versed in the issues and concerns of museums and libraries today. Peer reviewers dedicate their time and expertise to advance the highest professional practices in the field. The IMLS review process is well respected, and the success of our grant programs is largely due to the expertise of our reviewers. If selected, nonfederal panelists will be compensated for their service. Panelists will not be required to travel to Washington, DC, but will be required to read and evaluate grants independently and subsequently participate in conference calls with other panelists to discuss the grants.

Do grant reviewers get paid?

Do we pay grant reviewers? We do compensate each non-federal participant.

More details on how to become a reviewer for these programs can be found below. For a list of sustainable agriculture programs, see our Grassroots Guide to Federal Food and Farm Programs. You may also access documents of the Department published in the Federal Register by using the article search feature at Specifically, through the advanced search feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published by the Department. The Public Inspection pageon FederalRegister.gov offers a preview of documents scheduled to appear in the next day’s Federal Register issue. The Public Inspection page may also include documents scheduled for later issues, at the request of the issuing agency.

How Do We Choose Reviewers?

Over 50 degree programs, with online and continuing education for personal and professional development. The following is a selection of programs where applications are peer-reviewed annually. The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts. The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov.

  • Reviewers should be comfortable reading a large volume of material in a defined period of time and be capable of providing in-depth individual analysis, and/or participating in small group discussions about the applications.
  • The OJP seeks qualified professionals to evaluate grant applications based on the specialist’s expertise, demographics and prior experience as a reviewer.
  • Congress and the public are more likely to support programs that yield successful, high-impact results.
  • Reviewers evaluate their assigned applications individually and then confer with other panel members for team discussions that will derive a consensus review.
  • USDA recruits members of the public with subject expertise to serve on grant review panels.
  • Application scores are then used to inform the Secretary’s funding decisions.
  • Outreach and Assistance for Socially Disadvantaged and Veteran Farmers and Ranchers .

All selected panelists will be required to sign a “Conflict of Interest/Non-Disclosure Statement.” OSERS expects to conduct approximately 24 grant competitions to fund a wide range of projects, which will take place between April 2020 and September 2020. If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official edition of the Federal Register.

This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA’s archives.gov. Technical experts may nominate themselves for inclusion in PRIS by sending an e-mail request including a brief CV toBenjamin Packard() of EPA.

If chosen, reviewers are for selected for particular grant programs based on their knowledge, education and experience. Some grant reviews will require on site meetings usually in Washington, DC, however it varies depending on the grant being reviewed.

federal grant reviewer

The panel reviews proposals over the phone, via video conference, or in person (in Washington, D.C. or at regional locations) to recommend and rank proposals for funding. Panels have different final decision-making processes depending on the program. Expert peer panel volunteers are critical to the success of the TMIP Peer Review Program. Serving on a TMIP peer review expert panel provides practitioners with a unique opportunity to shape the advancement of modeling practices and participate in a valuable peer networking and knowledge sharing experience. If you have an interest in volunteering to serve on an expert peer panel contact theTMIP Moderatorfor more details. All new reviewers will be required to take an online reviewer training prior to participating in the review process. If you have expertise in certain subjects, you may be able to evaluate grant applications.

If you have specific, documented experience in these areas, it may greatly increase the likelihood that SAMHSA will select you as a peer reviewer. The U.S. Department of Labor’s Employment and Training Administration uses a peer review process to assist in the review and selection of competitive grant applications.

Health Care Reform

Reviewers will receive $140 per application reviewed and returned to SAMHSA in the timeline specified for each program. The FY2021 review is anticipated to include separate competitions occurring in July and October. If selected, you will be contacted to confirm availability for specific dates. Reviewers should expect to commit approximately six weeks to complete the reviews, including the consensus team review. NIFA actively recruits farmers, community food advocates, and non-profit leaders to serve on the Peer Review Panel for CFP. For more information, contact the National Program Leader listed under ‘additional information on on the USDA Community Food Program page. You can learn more about the grant by reading the Request for Application , which can also be found on the CFP page.

How To Apply

Reviewers meet in person to evaluate and rank each proposal based on relevance and scientific merit. OJP actively seeks qualified individuals to join the pool of subject matter experts it calls upon to review the strengths and weaknesses of applications for grant funding. Whether you are selected to review applications for a particular solicitation is based on factors such as subject matter expertise, demographics , and prior experience as a reviewer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *